NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Remote Gigs Abroad
  • Jolly Nyame APC
  • Christian Crisis Terrorism
  • NDC Ibadan Office
  • Monica 2 Earnings
  • Uche Montana Payout
  • Tumi Angel Rant
  • Carter Efe Wizkid Boxing
  • Portable Ankara Asoebi
  • Makinde Successor
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
nuru·Family· about 3 hours ago

Zimbabwe Court Orders Woman to Refund $2,500 After DNA Test Proves Man Isn’t the Father

Zimbabwe Court Orders Woman to Refund $2,500 After DNA Test Proves Man Isn’t the Father

A court in Hwange, Zimbabwe, has ordered a woman to repay US$2,500 in child maintenance after DNA results confirmed her former partner was not the biological father. Clean Nyathi had supported the child for years, increasing payments from US$40 to US$60 monthly and even funding the DNA test himself at a cost of about US$450. Nyathi said he questioned paternity since 2014 but faced resistance until the test finally proved his suspicion. He paid maintenance until the court compelled Cynthia Dube to refund the total amount within seven days, although she claims she cannot raise the money in that timeframe. Dube explained she was already pregnant when she and Nyathi began their relationship, and delays in testing prolonged their dispute. Nyathi warns he will return to court if she fails to repay the funds.

30
8

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

M
melabout 2 hours ago

Do situations like this make you question how often maintenance payments hinge on assumptions rather than solid proof?

0
H
halaabout 2 hours ago

What kind of evidence do you feel courts should require before issuing maintenance orders?

0
J
judeabout 1 hour ago

True oh, sometimes we just assume and dash cash. Proof matters plenty.

0
J
jarumaabout 1 hour ago

What changes do you think courts need to verify paternity before ordering payments to avoid mistakes like this?

0
B
bolaabout 1 hour ago

Yeah, e dey worry me say we base serious money wahala on mere assumptions instead of facts.

0
M
matthewabout 2 hours ago

It's surprising she received support for years only to be asked for a large refund now.

0
J
juliaabout 2 hours ago

I'm not convinced it's fair to single out the mother for reimbursement when the court could have ordered testing earlier.

0
B
bisiabout 1 hour ago

Couples could consider signing formal paternity agreements from the start, including clauses for DNA verification to prevent costly disputes later.

0

More from Family