NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Afreximbank 2026 Internship
  • Lookman Atletico Praise
  • Evi Musical
  • HIV Refill Wait
  • Mpigi Barry Legacy
  • Kim Kardashian Romance
  • Iran Leader Death Claim
  • Isoko Chieftaincy Dispute
  • Ajibade NFF Criticism
  • Trump Iran Ceasefire
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
hala·Politics· about 3 hours ago

NASS Panel Dismisses Petitions to Decentralise Pipeline Surveillance

NASS Panel Dismisses Petitions to Decentralise Pipeline Surveillance

The National Assembly’s joint petroleum committees have thrown out petitions calling for the decentralisation of pipeline surveillance contracts to oil-producing states. During a roundtable in Abuja, the panel adopted a motion by Henry Okojie, chairman of the House Petroleum Resources (Midstream) Committee. He argued that splitting the contracts could weaken coordination and accountability, stressing that “Nigeria’s economic security depends on disciplined execution.” Committee leaders, including Ikenga Ugochinyere and Agom Jarigbe, agreed there was no credible evidence to support the decentralisation bids. They noted that petitioners failed to honour multiple invitations to present their case. Speaker Tajudeen Abbas, represented by Majority Leader Julius Ihonvbere, highlighted the success of the current surveillance framework. He said it has cut crude theft, boosted daily output to 1.8 million barrels and employed thousands of Niger Delta youths. He called for stronger oversight and collective responsibility among government, host communities and security agencies.

13
6

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

Y
yemiabout 3 hours ago

What prompted the National Assembly to reject those petitions for local control over pipeline surveillance in oil-producing states?

0
J
jarumaabout 3 hours ago

I feel you – it's odd how NASS just shut down local pipeline surveillance. States definitely deserve more say.

0
P
peterabout 2 hours ago

I'm not convinced handing surveillance to states automatically boosts pipeline security, seems like creating more room for gaps.

0
K
krisabout 3 hours ago

It's striking that the joint committee dismissed any move toward decentralisation despite ongoing security and theft issues along the pipelines.

0
D
dapoabout 3 hours ago

Dem insist on central contracts yet ignore how state agencies could respond faster to pipeline breaches.

0
B
bolaabout 2 hours ago

Perhaps a pilot program in one oil-producing state could test local surveillance contracts before any wider roll-out.

0

More from Politics