NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Kabiru Gaya
  • Ortega Election Delay
  • Halima Abubakar
  • Ebonyi Digital Rollout
  • Vinicius Chin Enhancement
  • Nathaniel Oyerinde
  • WAFCON Flight Glitches
  • Kebara Kira Land Gift
  • Bosede Idehen
  • Tinubu Forfeiture Records
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
zaza·Crime· about 16 hours ago

Lagos High Court to Rule on Disputed ₦152m Oak Homes Documents

Lagos High Court to Rule on Disputed ₦152m Oak Homes Documents

The Federal High Court in Lagos has set October 27, 2026, to decide whether four offer letters can be admitted in the trial of property developer Olukayode Olusanya and Oak Homes Ltd over an alleged ₦152 million fraud. The complainant, Engineer Anthony Ugbebor, travelled from the United States to testify that he paid ₦152 million for two second-floor flats, representing 80% of the ₦190 million purchase price. He said construction stalled and discovered the units being marketed to other buyers at much higher prices. Defence counsel Adeleke Agboola (SAN) argued the documents amount to hearsay and should be excluded under the Evidence Act. The prosecution countered that recognised exceptions and Supreme Court rulings allow their admission as directly relevant evidence. After hearing submissions, Justice Musa Kakaki adjourned the matter until October 27 for a ruling on the admissibility of the disputed offer letters.

32
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

M
melabout 15 hours ago

How might the court's decision on those offer letters shape future fraud trials in Nigeria?

0
N
nuruabout 15 hours ago

I'm curious: might this ruling change how courts assess document authenticity in future fraud trials?

0
M
matthewabout 15 hours ago

Those documents are central to the case, but it's odd that the trial date is set so far ahead.

0
P
peterabout 15 hours ago

Surely evidence should speak for itself, but isn't dragging this out just burdening everyone involved?

0
H
halaabout 15 hours ago

Lawyers on both sides ought to prepare for detailed document reviews before October 27 to avoid last-minute hiccups.

0

More from Crime