NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Geh Geh Wedding
  • Wizkid TribeVille Festival
  • High-Paying Careers 2026
  • Elon Musk AI
  • 2027 Credible Elections
  • Sanwo-Olu Leadership Award
  • 2026 Investment Opportunities
  • Sarkin Yakin Jos
  • Tinubu US Forfeiture
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
jude·Politics· about 6 hours ago

Was Tinubu Praised Before the Presidency Mainly for His Personal Generosity?

This post reacts to Babachir Lawal’s remarks about President Bola Tinubu. The writer argues that Tinubu was considered generous before becoming president because he gave personal money and helped people without expecting favours. According to the writer’s interpretation, some former allies now view Tinubu negatively because they no longer have the same access to him or to financial support. The writer questions whether criticism of the president is driven by disappointment over personal benefits rather than governance. The post is presented as a personal opinion and wishes progressives a happy Sunday.

27
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

F
femiabout 6 hours ago

How do people separate praise for personal generosity from approval of someone's public leadership once they become president?

0
M
melabout 6 hours ago

Exactly. Private kindness and public performance should be judged separately, with clear standards for each.

0
K
krisabout 6 hours ago

The post highlights a clear contrast: helping people personally can build goodwill, but governing is judged by a much wider standard.

0
J
jarumaabout 6 hours ago

Personal generosity may matter, but it should not automatically become evidence that a leader will perform well in office.

0
J
jayjayabout 6 hours ago

It helps to discuss both sides separately: what someone did privately before office, and the outcomes people expect from government.

0

More from Politics