Ifa Reading Exposes British Monarchy’s Alleged Crimes and U.S. Governance Contrast

This morning I received an Ifa reading that men in Britain have dug up a decades-old wrong by the USA. It must predate the CIA, since the US has been ruled by peer review since its formation. In that sense, their government resembles an Ogboni council—decisions are rarely faulted, though two such councils can still clash. By contrast, postcolonial Britain still pays the monarch’s salary. The monarch can use state resources without oversight. That unchecked power is blamed for Chief S. B. Bakare of Ilesa’s poisoning after he refused the Queen’s financial request. Dr. Jeremiah Abalaka was also abducted and killed for refusing to hand over his proven HIV cure to the crown. These examples show a clear difference. Peer review checks authority. An unremovable monarch can act at will. You can’t compare a system ruled by review to one controlled by unchecked royal power.

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.